Bid to rebury 1860s Army hero from Ventura's Cemetery Park on hold

By Kevin Clerici

Ventura County Star

Posted July 21, 2010 at 8:57 p.m., updated July 21, 2010 at 10:38 p.m.

.

 

One hundred forty years ago, Pvt. James Sumner was awarded the Medal of Honor — the Army’s highest honor — for his gallant actions after a band of Apache Indians kidnapped a settler’s child.

 

His grave site, as just reward, should be a place of the highest respect, says retired Marine Sgt. Craig “Gunny” Donor, who has been on a near two-year quest to give Sumner a “proper burial” since learning the war hero was among some 50 veterans interred at a cemetery-turned-city park in Ventura where picnickers spread blankets and flying disc-chasing dogs freely run and defecate on what he sees as hallowed ground.

 

Donor learned Wednesday city officials and others have little interest in seeing Sumner skip town.

 

“I’m not ready to give it up yet,” said city Parks and Recreation Commissioner Ed Wehan. The commission voted unanimously to postpone Donor’s request, which arrived last October, for two more months to allow further research into how to handle such requests.

 

Wehan and other commissioners acknowledge the dogs and animal feces are an unpleasant reality, but insisted to Donor they’re committed to a long-delayed and potentially costly effort to commemorate the more than 3,000 pioneers and former area residents interred at the hillside park, under city control since the early 1960s.

 

In the meantime, Sumner’s grave has a bronze plaque donated by a local veterans group and the park is mowed regularly, Commissioner Sharon Troll said. “We are treating him pretty darn well, except for the poop,” she said.

 

In a separate vote, the commission approved the text and location of three temporary signs reminding visitors of the memorial park’s past, but stopped short of deciding if and when the signs would be installed.

 

Patricia Clark Doerner, a local historian who has relatives buried at the 7-acre park between Main and Poli Street, feels Sumner is an important part of Ventura County history and should stay.

 

But Donor argued the city has had decades to properly recognize the site, and now it is broke and clearly has no intention of restoring the park to a cemetery. He said afterward he may seek a court order.

 

“They craftily dodged the question,” Donor said of the postponement. “They don’t want to make a decision.”

 

Even if the commission had sided with Donor, it wouldn’t have likely put the issue to rest.

 

No one knows exactly what will be found when crews begin digging where the skeletal remains of Sumner’s body are believed to be.

 

A 2006 ground-penetrating scan of portions of the cemetery park found intense ground movement in the soil there — as much as an inch a year. The soil in the area slips so much, it caused structural damage to a recreation center at the site, leading to its demolition in 1972.

 

Records dating to Sumner’s 1912 burial also are not as precise as officials would like, though burial lists and cemetery plot plans do exist.

 

“Clearly, it’s not a matter of just saying, ‘Dig here,’” Ventura’s acting Parks Manager Ralph Deex said in an interview. “I don’t know what they are going to find. I am not in the cemetery business. I can’t answer that.”

 

Records show the cemetery had its first burial in October 1862. Lack of maintenance by the Catholic Church allowed the cemetery to fall into disrepair and become a hub for illegal activity. The city agreed to take over in the early 1960s, converting it to a memorial park. Head stones, vaults and grave markers were collected by descendants or removed, but the remains of some 3,000 people were left in place.

 

Even Donor has doubts about what will be unearthed, though he’s assembled a special team to assist in Sumner’s recovery, including a bio-archeologist and graduate students from UCLA.

 

He also has the help of Gregg Walker, who is in the cemetery business.

 

Walker, who now runs Walker Funeral Services in Corona, is an Army veteran who spent time in the Army’s mortuary system assisting with the recovery and relocation of soldiers killed in combat across European battlefields.

 

Walker toured the gently sloping Cemetery Memorial Park and is convinced, worst-case scenario, Sumner’s remains shifted two to three feet, though he’s not conducted any ground-penetrating studies of his own. Rarely is the full skeleton intact, he said.

 

“But it’s not going to be a long distance away,” he said from Wednesday from Corona.

 

According to Donor’s research and Army records, Sumner, a 28-year-old immigrant from London, led the chase after the kidnapped child into a remote canyon in the Chiricahua Mountains in southeastern Arizona where an ambush was waiting. A fierce firefight ensued, and Army records say Sumner held off the hostile attackers until reinforcements arrived, driving the aggressors into the surrounding hills.

 

That was in 1869. President Ulysses S. Grant awarded Sumner his medal in 1870. Sumner later migrated to Los Angeles, then Oxnard, where he lived until dying of kidney failure at a Ventura hospital in 1912 at age 72. He never married nor had children, and therefore no heirs to come forward to speak to his grave’s condition, Donor said.

 

“He has no family, no one else to stand up for him, except for his brothers and sister in arms,” said Donor, 65, a retired aircraft engineer from Fontana and a state captain for the Patriot Guard Riders, a motorcycle club that honors fallen vets.

 

Seeing dogs run free and defecate on or near Sumner’s grave makes Donor’s blood boil. “Something had to be done,” he said. “That’s when I decided to take up the cause.”

 

No one knows where Sumner’s Medal of Honor is located, and it very well could be buried with him, providing critical evidence.

 

“That would be proof positive of him,” Donor said. “We are ready to move whatever is in that grave site. We take to heart the pledge to never leave a soldier, or infantryman, or airman behind.”

 

© 2010 Ventura County Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 

 

 COMMENTS

  • July 21, 2010
  • 9:14 p.m.
throwawaygenius writes:

City just wants to make sure a few more dogs relieve themselves on this veterans grave.....

  • July 21, 2010
  • 10:24 p.m.
redhat writes:

Perhaps some people would rather honor those buried there by retoring the place to a overgrown, weedy, unkempt trashy yard like it was before? I would rather see a nice, clean park area. So what if a dog or homeless person uses it occasionally. They certainly don't mean to disrespect anybody buried there. They know they will also have a similar destination some day.

  • July 21, 2010
  • 10:45 p.m.
throwawaygenius writes:

in response to redhat:

Perhaps some people would rather honor those buried there by retoring the place to a overgrown, weedy, unkempt trashy yard like it was before? I would rather see a nice, clean park area. So what if a dog or homeless person uses it occasionally. They certainly don't mean to disrespect anybody buried there. They know they will also have a similar destination some day.

Like it was before what? I grew up playing in that park in the 70's And took my kids there through the 90's until people started letting their dogs run free....We always read the markers and took the time to contemplate the buried. I have never seen that park in any sort of disrepair other than the land mines left behind by mans best friend...

  • July 21, 2010
  • 10:46 p.m.
rebel123 writes:

If he were my relative, I'd say leave him be to rest in peace. His soul is not buried there, just his remains. His honor is not buried there, just his remains. His memory is not buried there, just his remains. I'd take a dog park over a stone garden for my eternal resting place in a heart beat. Dog spelled backward is after all, God.

  • July 21, 2010
  • 10:59 p.m.
jill writes:

I would love to have a dog park above my final resting place. Dogs are beautiful creatures. And these wonderful dog owners care enough about their dogs to make sure they get out, get exercise and socialize. There is nothing wrong with having a dog park there. With all that's going on in the world, THIS is what bothers people?

  • July 22, 2010
  • 12:06 a.m.
lagfactor writes:

in response to rebel123:

If he were my relative, I'd say leave him be to rest in peace. His soul is not buried there, just his remains. His honor is not buried there, just his remains. His memory is not buried there, just his remains. I'd take a dog park over a stone garden for my eternal resting place in a heart beat. Dog spelled backward is after all, God.

aside from the dog spelled backwards part, i fully agree with you. if i were buried in a cemetery that doubled as a dog park, i'd have no problem with poo six feet above my decaying body... especially if it's a responsible owner who picks it up.

and the park (which it is now) is big enough for dogs to play on one part and for families to play on another.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 1:01 a.m.
Morethanyouknow writes:

I LOVE dogs, but I keep mine on a leash in public. I also pick up after my dog, and sometimes I pick up after strangers dogs, so that dogs don't get a bad 'rap'.

So about this 'park'
SIMPLE: A sign saying "Dogs must be on a leash" and then fine the violaters.

Remember I do love dogs, but humans must be held responsible for their offspring and pets.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 2:18 a.m.
richwd#237311 writes:

Redhat's talking about pre-70's Cemetery Park, as was stated in the article - it was an eye sore. Now, it's much more appropriate for what downtown Ventura has evolved to be. It's beautiful!

Every few years, someone is upset about some aspect of the park - never mind there's a parking lot there where over over 100 nameless Chumash are buried, or that there are at least that many in other unmarked graves in the grassy area of the park itself...

How about a few signs reminding dog owners to mind where thier dogs poop?

  • July 22, 2010
  • 3:48 a.m.
jws345 writes:

I grew up directly across Main Street from the old "City Cemetary", played in it, watched funerals occur there and every Fourth of July and Memorial Day took part in the celebration and honoring of Veterans at the Grave of the Unknown Soldier. If I remember correctly the remains in that grave were of an unidentified warrior whose barnch of service was not known. the memorial was a beautiful white marble spire with appropriate markings on a marble bench at the bottom. The cemetary itself was never in a state of disrepair, maintainence tools, mowers, rakes and grave digger's tools were kept in a crypt like stone hut above the Chinese section of the cemetary. It wasn't until the far seeing city fathers tore down the 'Bath house" on California Street and needed a place to put a new "Civic Center" that a campaign of "Eyesore", "High Crime area" "Drug dealings" began. And then these same foresighted, ("Farsided") dirctors of the future, built a monstrositiy of a building, without the engineering studies that would have told them that they were building on an ancient creekbed that was geoloically active, so within a few years they had to tear it down. What to do now?
The only thing they could do, make it a park so the parking lot would not go unused. Headstones that had marked the graves of pioneer Venturans were summarily uprooted and thrown into Hall Canyon. How's that for honoring the dead. The upshot of it all is that dispite themselves they got lucky. The park is lovely and is, to an old Venturan's way of thinking the best use possible for what's left of an old cemetary. Oh, and by the way, the Congressional Medal of Honor is not the Army's highest honor, it is the NATION'S HIGHEST HONOR. Leave Pvt. James Sumner alone and leave the park alone. It's Ventura history.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 5:04 a.m.
Iamhandyhood writes:

in response to jws345:

I grew up directly across Main Street from the old "City Cemetary", played in it, watched funerals occur there and every Fourth of July and Memorial Day took part in the celebration and honoring of Veterans at the Grave of the Unknown Soldier. If I remember correctly the remains in that grave were of an unidentified warrior whose barnch of service was not known. the memorial was a beautiful white marble spire with appropriate markings on a marble bench at the bottom. The cemetary itself was never in a state of disrepair, maintainence tools, mowers, rakes and grave digger's tools were kept in a crypt like stone hut above the Chinese section of the cemetary. It wasn't until the far seeing city fathers tore down the 'Bath house" on California Street and needed a place to put a new "Civic Center" that a campaign of "Eyesore", "High Crime area" "Drug dealings" began. And then these same foresighted, ("Farsided") dirctors of the future, built a monstrositiy of a building, without the engineering studies that would have told them that they were building on an ancient creekbed that was geoloically active, so within a few years they had to tear it down. What to do now?
The only thing they could do, make it a park so the parking lot would not go unused. Headstones that had marked the graves of pioneer Venturans were summarily uprooted and thrown into Hall Canyon. How's that for honoring the dead. The upshot of it all is that dispite themselves they got lucky. The park is lovely and is, to an old Venturan's way of thinking the best use possible for what's left of an old cemetary. Oh, and by the way, the Congressional Medal of Honor is not the Army's highest honor, it is the NATION'S HIGHEST HONOR. Leave Pvt. James Sumner alone and leave the park alone. It's Ventura history.

The Medal of honor IS the Army's highest awarded medal. It is the highest awarded medal in any branch of the service. It is NOT the Nations highest award as one has to have been in the Military to have received it. As far as the park goes...... I think they should build some type of memorial to honor ALL the veterans buried there.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 5:52 a.m.
TatooU writes:

The ultimate in disresect to our fore fathers. Since when does dogs rights trump over man?

  • July 22, 2010
  • 6:10 a.m.
jetfixer writes:

I say just remove the DOGS

  • July 22, 2010
  • 7 a.m.
180view writes:

It seems that the dog owners leaving their dog’s sh!t all over the park is the problem.

Why not have dog poop bags at the park so inconsiderate m0r0ons can pick up their dog’s sh!t?.

Still think playing, picnicking or laying down reading a book at that park is creepy with dead bodies underneath.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 7:16 a.m.
cupcake writes:

"In the meantime, Sumner’s grave has a bronze plaque donated by a local veterans group and the park is mowed regularly, Commissioner Sharon Troll said. “We are treating him pretty darn well, except for the poop,” she said."

That comment is unbelievable!

  • July 22, 2010
  • 7:22 a.m.
twojrts writes:

With 7 acres of parkland, certainly there is an acre or so to be fenced off for the dogs to run and play in. This is just not right to disrespect the heroes of the past in this way!

Come on Ventura, WAKE UP AND SMELL THE POOP!

  • July 22, 2010
  • 7:29 a.m.
halfbodybrain writes:

in response to lagfactor:

aside from the dog spelled backwards part, i fully agree with you. if i were buried in a cemetery that doubled as a dog park, i'd have no problem with poo six feet above my decaying body... especially if it's a responsible owner who picks it up.

and the park (which it is now) is big enough for dogs to play on one part and for families to play on another.

At first this article reminded me of a history class, it's good to know the background but come on Star a little bit too much information.

Anyhow, I agree with both comments. Dog owners just have to be a little bit more considerate picking up after their poochs. Their is no disrespect here. Nuff said...

  • July 22, 2010
  • 7:37 a.m.
Ventusian writes:

I would like to see people quit referring to the park as a dog park. It is a park that attracts many people who bring their dogs. The dogs tend to be in a smallish section that is not even half the park. The dog owners do a good job of picking up after their dogs and rarely do I see anything that they might have missed. I use this park quite a bit and the fact that dogs are often there does not get in the way of my enjoyment of it.
Now, I know several people who have the cremains of their loved ones in a card board box in the closet, or in an urn on the entertainment center with South Park and tampon commercials often blaring. There are different ideas about what is respectful to the dead, but I guarantee you, the dead don't care! These ideas, like so many cultural norms, shift over time and region. Your great grandparents may have had their photo taken with their loved one dead in the coffin! http://cogitz.com/2009/08/28/memento-...

  • July 22, 2010
  • 7:40 a.m.
USAPatriot writes:

The City of Ventura has hit a new low. I realize they are hellbent on being just as bad as Oxnard, but even Oxnard hasn't ignored anything this shameful that I'm aware of.

Ventura's white trash city government is the joke of Ventura County city Governments right along side Fillmore.

I'm ashamed of this inaction and disgrace Ventura has perpetrated against a man of such great honor.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 7:48 a.m.
CamarilloMom2 writes:

This guys' been dead over a hundred years - he's gone. His soul is wherever it is, and his skeleton is probably almost completely decayed. Does it really matter where a body decays? I certainly wouldn't want my family to spend a dime moving my skeleton from one place to another - if I'm dead - I'm dead. My corpse has no meaning at all.

On the other hand, the dogs should go. We shouldn't have anything that is apt to poop on the lawn running around where kids play. Parks are for people! Live ones!

  • July 22, 2010
  • 7:56 a.m.
smacktalk writes:

Why are people worried about this now, the cemetery was turned into a park 40 years ago. Now that it is news the native americans will start crying that this is their land taken from them brutily by this man. Ventura city will have to pay to go get all the discarded headstones out of Aliso Canyon and Donor got his name in the paper. Wouldn't it be easier just to post a sign and make illegal to have dogs there. NO DOGS ALLOWED. Wait a minute that would be to easy.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 7:57 a.m.
halfbodybrain writes:

in response to CamarilloMom2:

This guys' been dead over a hundred years - he's gone. His soul is wherever it is, and his skeleton is probably almost completely decayed. Does it really matter where a body decays? I certainly wouldn't want my family to spend a dime moving my skeleton from one place to another - if I'm dead - I'm dead. My corpse has no meaning at all.

On the other hand, the dogs should go. We shouldn't have anything that is apt to poop on the lawn running around where kids play. Parks are for people! Live ones!

Just so you know there are millions of pets in our county and uumm they're here to stay. What makes a good pet is socialization and exercise. Common sense would tell me a dog park is a good idea not only for pets but for people as well. I would much rather have a neighbor with a well behaved dog living next to me than one that barks all night due to lack of exercise or interaction. Dog parks are enclosed and don't affect kids running around because it would not take the entire space.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 7:59 a.m.
Tex_Watson writes:

“We are treating him pretty darn well, except for the poop,” she said.
This woman thinks she's funny?

Pvt. James Sumner was awarded the Medal of Honor and needs to be treated as a war hero.

This would be national news if this site had Indian remains, the commissioners wouldn't be making a joke about it either.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 8:12 a.m.
DesertGurl writes:

in response to Tex_Watson:

“We are treating him pretty darn well, except for the poop,” she said.
This woman thinks she's funny?

Pvt. James Sumner was awarded the Medal of Honor and needs to be treated as a war hero.

This would be national news if this site had Indian remains, the commissioners wouldn't be making a joke about it either.

I completely agree.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 8:13 a.m.
westwind28 writes:

Good morning it is a sad day in the US when one of our fallen Heros not to say a Medal of Honor winner has his finial resting place in a Dog Park. I feel that he should be moved to a National cemetary where he can rest with other heros of this great country if nothing else fince off any and all that are resting there and keep the Dogs out of that area lets show some respect for all the people that are resting there. Lets all keep our fallen in our minds and our Hearts

  • July 22, 2010
  • 8:14 a.m.
Blaine writes:

in response to Tex_Watson:

“We are treating him pretty darn well, except for the poop,” she said.
This woman thinks she's funny?

Pvt. James Sumner was awarded the Medal of Honor and needs to be treated as a war hero.

This would be national news if this site had Indian remains, the commissioners wouldn't be making a joke about it either.

I was thinking the same
Is she one sarcastic witch or what?

  • July 22, 2010
  • 8:20 a.m.
herefirst writes:

Maybe Bill Fulton can find this guys relatives....and charge them back rent for the plot and upkeep.....

  • July 22, 2010
  • 8:25 a.m.
USAPatriot writes:

I think these people should be tracked down and pelted with Dog droppings. See if they feel like they're being treated well.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 8:35 a.m.
Superfluous writes:

People have been dying for thousands of years and buried all over the planet. It's all sacred ground. Clean up after your pets. This is such a non issue, why does it keep being resurrected?

  • July 22, 2010
  • 8:38 a.m.
luv2sail#205257 writes:

Just another example of the worth of a Vet to the Country. I served, am proud I served and think that those that didn't should, at the very least, show some appreciation of those that did.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 8:40 a.m.
blue_eyes writes:

This 19th Century hero and the many others buried at Cemetary Park - at least those with grave markers - get much more visibility and remembrance here than they'd ever get in a fenced off public or private facility. My son and I learned about Pvt. Sumner by literally stumbling over the plaque that marks his resting place. We regularly return to the park to tour his and the other markers - and yes, when we bring the dog we have a leash and bags. His name would still be unknown to me if it were not for the accessibility to this well maintained, beautiful park. Perhaps this biker group should leave him where he is so that future generations can 'stumble' onto his legacy rather than letting him fade into obscurity in another less trafficked location.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 8:51 a.m.
FirstAmendment writes:

You people getting all bent out of shape over this are pathetic. The grave is over 100 years old! So what if it's a park now. No one cares but a bunch of uppity id10ts.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 8:59 a.m.
Mister_S writes:

Why not construct a Veterans Monument on the site of Pvt. Sumner's grave, honoring all vets and recognizing his particular bravery. It might include the citation accompanying this Medal of Honor, recalling this mans deeds while earning it. It is the highest honor to this community to have Pvt. James Sumner interred among us, and the dishonor of his present state could be remedied in this way.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 9:05 a.m.
human writes:

Basic cultural anthropology courses often teach that one of the evolutionary traits of mankind occurred when there was a recognition and special treatment offered for the dead, such as placing flowers, seeds, ornaments in a resting place of the deceased. Has Ventura decided, single handedly, to revert to pre neanderthal times? Wow

  • July 22, 2010
  • 9:09 a.m.
14_Fore writes:

It would not be repectful if you were a dog owner and let Fido run loose on Arlington National Cemetary or something local like Ivy Lawn for that matter. Why do it there?

  • July 22, 2010
  • 9:20 a.m.
gregoryhca#728677 writes:

in response to westwind28:

Good morning it is a sad day in the US when one of our fallen Heros not to say a Medal of Honor winner has his finial resting place in a Dog Park. I feel that he should be moved to a National cemetary where he can rest with other heros of this great country if nothing else fince off any and all that are resting there and keep the Dogs out of that area lets show some respect for all the people that are resting there. Lets all keep our fallen in our minds and our Hearts

Maybe we could move him to this park:
http://www.congressionalcemetery.org/ or the hundreds of others around the country that have either created dogwalking programs or had old cemeteries turned into dual use parks/cemeteries. Ventura just happens to have a small group of people that want to make it sound like what is happening here is not common and some horrible thing. Having said that, I guess I don't understand why, if a group wants to move Mr. Sumner's remains why they shouldn't be allowed to do so.

The park is, by the way, not a legal "Dog Park" and has signs that require dogs to be on leash. I live above the park and can tell you that most of the time the park is virtually empty of people or dogs and anyone wishing to sit in solitude at the grave site of a loved one or a stranger for that matter could do so most anytime without interruption. I take my dogs to Arroya Verde during its legal off leash hours as I think it is a safer environment for my dogs to enjoy. But I think it is wonderful that the living can share space harmoniously with the pioneers of our past and can't understand why this story needs to be ressurected every year or so.

“The earth belongs to the living and not to the dead,” Thomas Jefferson insisted in an exchange of letters with James Madison in the fall of 1789.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 9:24 a.m.
jjohnjj writes:

Ashes to ashes, dust to dust.

At this point in time, a central memorial to the deceased makes more sense that restoring the cemetery to it's original state.

Such a monument would not diminish the site's recreational value, and its presence would give the park a touch of dignity.

That might be all it takes to persuade the few negligent dog owners to bring plastic bags when they visit.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 9:45 a.m.
beachgurl writes:

Superfluous you hit the nail on the head!

  • July 22, 2010
  • 9:45 a.m.
ThinkLogic writes:

Yes, it IS completely disrespectful to the memory of these fallen heroes to allow dogs to run freely and *crap* all over their graves. Think about it.

That some people can't see how completely insulting this is shows how low we have dipped as a society and how little honor there is left among us.

Dogs are ANIMALS...and are not on the same par with human beings. (Although I could argue that some human beings may be on an equal par with animals...)

This infuriates me...

  • July 22, 2010
  • 9:46 a.m.
ThinkLogic writes:

in response to 14_Fore:

It would not be repectful if you were a dog owner and let Fido run loose on Arlington National Cemetary or something local like Ivy Lawn for that matter. Why do it there?

EXACTLY.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 10:05 a.m.
CamarilloMom2 writes:

It's bizarre how you guys keep referring to this as "his resting place" and "treatment of a veteran." The dead aren't resting - they're decomposing. And the time to treat a veteran properly is while he's alive and aware of said treatment.

Why assign so much meaning to a pile of old bones that have nothing to do with the man they used to inhabit?

The problem here is that people are letting dogs defecate in public areas. If you want to have a pet, that's wonderful, but it should defecate on YOUR property - not at the park where people walk and kids play. Even if you pick the bulk of it up, you can never get it all and it still leaves bacteria and parasites behind.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 10:30 a.m.
calandman writes:

Notice none of the so very concerned activists want to use or raise their own money to do anything to respect the long dead and buried. They only beg to use scarce City funds. Honoring the dead doesn't need to preclude the use of the living to enjoy a park. These people need to let it be and find some other nonsense to occupy their time.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 10:40 a.m.
vceader writes:

Ban the dogs from the park. Problem solved. Move on.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 10:41 a.m.
DestinationTruth writes:

Every few years some nutjob has to start some BS about the park. It's a park now, get over it.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 10:44 a.m.
DestinationTruth writes:

Montalvo Hill Park, people, need to take their crapping dogs elsewear. Like in their yard.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 10:54 a.m.
reallywtf writes:

in response to Morethanyouknow:

I LOVE dogs, but I keep mine on a leash in public. I also pick up after my dog, and sometimes I pick up after strangers dogs, so that dogs don't get a bad 'rap'.

So about this 'park'
SIMPLE: A sign saying "Dogs must be on a leash" and then fine the violaters.

Remember I do love dogs, but humans must be held responsible for their offspring and pets.

First off Thank you for being a responsible pet owner for your pet and others!

You are soooo right! People have to be responsible for their pets and offspring and unfortunately they are not. It's a sign of the times, and in this case, people would rather not honor, but rather have a place to let there dogs run and poo on our history. It's a shame that most are so wrapped up in themselves.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 11:05 a.m.
throwawaygenius writes:

This is a lot less about the people that are buried there and more about self entitled dog owners that think they deserve a place to let there dogs run free. They have no consideration for people that choose to not have a hairy slobbering animal all up in there picnic. Regardless of what anyone thinks a dog is not human, it is not just playing, and no I don't care if it just wants to be my friend. It is a lot like the people that take there dogs in restaurants and other public spaces and say thing like he is part of our family or he is better behaved than most children. If you don't live in a home where your dog can run free and be happy maybe you should move and leave the parks for actual people to enjoy.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 11:13 a.m.
throwawaygenius writes:

Weirdest thing about this story is how many times the star has changed the title.............

  • July 22, 2010
  • 12:11 p.m.
JEH writes:

I think it would be much easier to ban the dogs then to move the bodies. I hate going to a park and having to watch out for feces everywhere, even if its picked up some remains, people step in it, and it ends up in our houses. Dogs should run freely in dog parks not this park. I have a dog and I wouldn't take him places where he might poop on peoples graves. Thats just terrible.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 1:56 p.m.
GratefulAmerican writes:

in response to blue_eyes:

This 19th Century hero and the many others buried at Cemetary Park - at least those with grave markers - get much more visibility and remembrance here than they'd ever get in a fenced off public or private facility. My son and I learned about Pvt. Sumner by literally stumbling over the plaque that marks his resting place. We regularly return to the park to tour his and the other markers - and yes, when we bring the dog we have a leash and bags. His name would still be unknown to me if it were not for the accessibility to this well maintained, beautiful park. Perhaps this biker group should leave him where he is so that future generations can 'stumble' onto his legacy rather than letting him fade into obscurity in another less trafficked location.

Are you kidding me? Leave him in a park where he is disrespected so "future generations can STUMBLE upon him"? Wow.....cannot even believe I read that...I don't think moving him to a NATIONAL cemetery is a LESS TRAFFICKED location...he would get the HONOR AND RESPECT he DESERVES!

  • July 22, 2010
  • 2:08 p.m.
CamarilloMom2 writes:

JEH -
Dog owners think they should be allowed to take their pets to the park, let them poop and pee all over the place, approach strangers and romp in the children's play area. And you're right - the poop issue is still absolutely GROSS, even if the owner picks it up.

I say, ban dogs from all public places. And hint: if you don't have a big, private yard, don't get a dog! I'm sick of people in condos and apartments keeping inappropriate pets and then taking them out to greenbelts and parks to defecate.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 2:12 p.m.
GratefulAmerican writes:

I cannot believe some of these comments, obviously many people responding to this have no respect for the dead, or our veterans. If Craig Donor has come up with a plan, people to do this, experts and funds to move this hero, why don't they let him?! He is doing the right thing, and the City of Ventura has been doing the wrong thing since they turned this into a city park, thus..all city parks allow dogs. I cannot believe Commissioner TROLL stating that "we are treating him pretty well, except for the poop". She is a real winner. This is all very infuriating....HONOR THIS MAN and ALL the veterans in this park...do the right thing.....

  • July 22, 2010
  • 2:17 p.m.
DestinationTruth writes:

Yet another "Tempest in a Teapot."

I would rather have life going on above me, than the silence of a Cemetary.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 2:53 p.m.
rebel123 writes:

in response to TatooU:

The ultimate in disresect to our fore fathers. Since when does dogs rights trump over man?

I think the ultimate disrespect to those who came before us is what we did to the native cultures everywhere we tread on this land. We have no problem building on sacred sites as long as they are some other culture's dead. Leave the old guy alone. He doesn't care!

  • July 22, 2010
  • 2:57 p.m.
rebel123 writes:

in response to CamarilloMom2:

JEH -
Dog owners think they should be allowed to take their pets to the park, let them poop and pee all over the place, approach strangers and romp in the children's play area. And you're right - the poop issue is still absolutely GROSS, even if the owner picks it up.

I say, ban dogs from all public places. And hint: if you don't have a big, private yard, don't get a dog! I'm sick of people in condos and apartments keeping inappropriate pets and then taking them out to greenbelts and parks to defecate.

I take it you don't have a dog. As long as pet owners clean up after their pets and keep them on a leash when not at an off-leash park, why do you have an issue? Even dogs with large yards need daily walks and socialization outside of their yard. Yes, many let their dogs run loose and don't pick up the poop. Those are not the majority of dog owners or we'd be knee deep in dog poop. Chill. Maybe you need a dog. Studies show they help lower blood pressure. Sounds like you may need one!

  • July 22, 2010
  • 3:14 p.m.
venturashell writes:

cupcake, couldn't agree with you more. No matter which side of this issue you land on, that comment was the most callous and insensitive thing I can think of to say to someone who's trying to honor someone they respect and admire. All I can way is Wow!!

  • July 22, 2010
  • 5:21 p.m.
jimmyd2 writes:

Wasn't there a recent article that documented the exhumation and relocation of a civil war general (and U.S. Senator) from this cemetery to Evergreen? Maybe it was prior to it being turned over to the city.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 6:02 p.m.
DestinationTruth writes:

Mr. Donor, He was not left behind. He died at 72. He is in his grave. His Army days were long over. "No Man Left Behind." applies to active duty military in combat.

Don't you have anything better to do with your time? Our economy is in shambles, and you are going on about someone who has been dead for 98 years. He doesn't care. Maybe you should pay for it yourself, since it's such a big deal to you.

Most of us have better things to be concerned with.

Get a Life!!!

  • July 22, 2010
  • 6:07 p.m.
DestinationTruth writes:

And has it ever crossed your mind that is were he wanted his bones to lie, in Ventura. After all this was his final home. Of course it's all about what you want isn't it. Is this something you need to do to make yourself feel better.

And Yes, I am a Veteran of the Vietnam War.

Leave him alone, and take your agenda with you.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 7:06 p.m.
CamarilloMom2 writes:

Rebel123-

I do not currently own a dog, but I have in the past. I understood that my dog was my property and my responsibility, and that other people did not necessarily want to be around him, see him pooping and peeing on public lawns, or imagine what was just on the grass before they sat down for a picnic with their kids. I kept him at home, and exercised him in my yard. I think it is beyond arrogant for people to take their pets into public places. Sorry.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 8:57 p.m.
KJW1026 writes:

Absolutely disgraceful! Those of you that aren't outraged by the fact that dogs are defecating on the graves of U.S. service members obviously have never served your country! You sit in your little bubble world not realizing the sacrifices that are and have been made for you EVERY DAY! Our service members, current, past and future deserve the utmost respect and allowing dogs to defecate on the grave sites of those who have served our country with honor is absolutely reprehensible! I love my kids and my dogs but would NEVER consider allowing them to trample the resting place of someone who served my country!

  • July 22, 2010
  • 9:43 p.m.
GratefulAmerican writes:

in response to DestinationTruth:

And has it ever crossed your mind that is were he wanted his bones to lie, in Ventura. After all this was his final home. Of course it's all about what you want isn't it. Is this something you need to do to make yourself feel better.

And Yes, I am a Veteran of the Vietnam War.

Leave him alone, and take your agenda with you.

If you are really a Vietnam Vet then you wouldn't spew such hatred at someone who just wants to do the RIGHT THING, someone who is a fellow Vietnam Veteran...of all the Vets I have met, none of them would have your opinion. And no, I am not a veteran, just someone who is damn glad we have people who step up to defend our freedoms. No one should disrespect ANYONES grave, but ESPECIALLY someone who was given the Medal of Honor, or any of the other people and veterans buried at this site. I wonder if James Sumner knew that some day people would disrespect his grave this way he would want to be buried in this sorry place? I doubt it. I think YOU need to get a life and there is no agenda here besides respecting veterans....and a Medal of Honor winner, but I guess you wouldn't understand any of that because YOU DON'T CARE

  • July 22, 2010
  • 10:07 p.m.
DestinationTruth writes:

in response to GratefulAmerican:

If you are really a Vietnam Vet then you wouldn't spew such hatred at someone who just wants to do the RIGHT THING, someone who is a fellow Vietnam Veteran...of all the Vets I have met, none of them would have your opinion. And no, I am not a veteran, just someone who is damn glad we have people who step up to defend our freedoms. No one should disrespect ANYONES grave, but ESPECIALLY someone who was given the Medal of Honor, or any of the other people and veterans buried at this site. I wonder if James Sumner knew that some day people would disrespect his grave this way he would want to be buried in this sorry place? I doubt it. I think YOU need to get a life and there is no agenda here besides respecting veterans....and a Medal of Honor winner, but I guess you wouldn't understand any of that because YOU DON'T CARE

He is not stepping up to defend anyones freedom. No one is disrespecting anyones grave. It's a park now! And since you have not served, you have no right saying anything to me.

The guy has been buried their since 1912, and all of a sudden it's an issue. Nobody is walking their pet over to his grave so the pet can dump on it.

Get Real, if he is so concerned let him pay for it, not taxpayer dollars when times are so tough.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 10:08 p.m.
GratefulAmerican writes:

in response to DestinationTruth:

Mr. Donor, He was not left behind. He died at 72. He is in his grave. His Army days were long over. "No Man Left Behind." applies to active duty military in combat.

Don't you have anything better to do with your time? Our economy is in shambles, and you are going on about someone who has been dead for 98 years. He doesn't care. Maybe you should pay for it yourself, since it's such a big deal to you.

Most of us have better things to be concerned with.

Get a Life!!!

You should educate yourself, funds are there for moving HERO James Sumner, thanks to Mr. Donor.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 10:10 p.m.
atroll2#696418 writes:

Cemetery Park is just that. It is a Cemetery and also a passive park. What it isn't is a dog park. Dogs must be kept on leash and people are expected to pick up after their dogs and themselves. Cemetery Park is posted in many locations where to find our dog parks and that dogs cannot be off leash at this lovely peaceful place.
I did not make a joke about dog poop at this wonderful site. I did, however, talk about how well Cemetery Park is kept and that Sgt. James Sumner's grave is always trimmed and clean along with the other 3,000 plus war veteran's, pioneer's , Chumash and people of all religious, colors and nationalities that are buried there. I was making a statement about how we truly care about our past and how I had researched the many Medal of Honor Awardees' final place of rest and that Sgt. Sumner's final resting place is green, peaceful, well taken care of with the one exception of yes, dog poop at Cemetery Park. No one wants dog poop or any other kind of trash at Cemetery Park. I personally am offended at people who do not follow simple rules and allow their dog to run and poop where ever and just feel it is up to someone else to bend over and pick their dogs poop up or for some child or person to step in it. That is shameful .
I am there every week or so and I walk around Cemetery Park and if I see poop I pick it up. So do other considerate people. I also ask people who's dogs are off leash and running everywhere to kindly hook them back up and to be responsible about cleaning up after their dog. It amazes me that so many say that they do clean up after their dogs but they have no mutt mitts or bags to pick the poop up. They usually quickly leave the park. Now those that have their dogs on leash have mutt mitts or plastic bags with them usually. Very nice responsible people and respectful of the area and those that are interned in this very special place.
I am thankful to all who came before me and left this beautiful area for us all to enjoy. I admire them, I honor them and I will do all in my power to see that their final resting place does not get lost or neglected like it did many year back. Everyone who was at that meeting knows this.
These statements are mine and mine alone. My opinions belong to me. If anyone wants to speak with me, I am available. Contact the Parks, Recreation and Community Service Department and they will give me your number.
Sharon Troll

  • July 22, 2010
  • 10:32 p.m.
DestinationTruth writes:

So you write all this stuff and call yourself a troll. That is pretty funny. I think GA is this Donor dude. And it is a park, not a cemetery, it was a cemetery. And you are entitled to your opinion, just as I am entitled to mine.

  • July 22, 2010
  • 10:36 p.m.
DestinationTruth writes:

I am going to tick off some people here. The Army in those days were nothing but a tool for the railroad barons. To push Native Americans off their land. This does not merit the CMH. He is not a hero, he was just trying to save his own skin.

  • July 23, 2010
  • 7:44 a.m.
herefirst writes:

RE:the commission approved the text and location of three temporary signs reminding visitors of the memorial park’s past, but stopped short of deciding if and when the signs would be installed.

But they were quick to raise the pensions of ventura cops and fire by 33%.....

  • July 23, 2010
  • 8:11 a.m.
stevense writes:

The chinese part of the area was paved over. It is the original campo santo in Ventura. Leave the soldier there. Keep the dogs out of the place.

  • July 23, 2010
  • 9:37 a.m.
throwawaygenius writes:

The mass grave site under the parking area also contains irish, native americans, and others that had no money for a proper burial

  • July 24, 2010
  • 5:15 p.m.
lagfactor writes:

in response to CamarilloMom2:

Rebel123-

I do not currently own a dog, but I have in the past. I understood that my dog was my property and my responsibility, and that other people did not necessarily want to be around him, see him pooping and peeing on public lawns, or imagine what was just on the grass before they sat down for a picnic with their kids. I kept him at home, and exercised him in my yard. I think it is beyond arrogant for people to take their pets into public places. Sorry.

ha, what? you exercised your dog in a yard? not to be a jerk or anything, but being a responsible dog owner does not mean having a big yard. it means taking it out for walks, runs, swims, and to socialize with other people and animals on a daily basis.

a public place implies for the PUBLIC, which can include dogs at any time since the public has a favorite pet called a dog.

  • July 24, 2010
  • 6:35 p.m.
archer writes:

I have been to that park hundreds of times, all of the dogs I have seen there are OFF lease(against the law), and defecate without being picked up(against the law). Homeless litter(used drug syringes and alcohol containers) and defecate in the park. I have NEVER seen anyone cited for law breaking EVER. If Ventura city officials were smarter like owner's of other historic cemeteries, they would better use this historic cemetery than a dog toilet or homeless 'shooting gallery'. It's been done by other cities, Ventura doesn't have the intelligence to protect Veterans, native Americans, early Spanish, Asian or city father's graves from descecration by feces and urine. LINK:
http://www.restorestmarys.org/

  • July 25, 2010
  • 5:44 p.m.
lagfactor writes:

i've also been to that park hundreds of times with my dogs, and have witnessed the city and police coming to tell everyone to leave and to cite people. archer, it DOES happen, and you may be happy to know that it is happening more. however, not once have i found syringes, alcohol containers, or have even seen homeless people using it. the worst is the poop if someone doesn't pick it up. if i see someone's dog poop and they don't pick it up, i give them a bag.

"cemetery" park is now a park. it will no doubt have the same issues with dogs and irresponsible dog owners just like any park does.

  • July 26, 2010
  • 10:07 p.m.
ElCid writes:

If you were to remove all the headstones and flush markers from the graves at Ivy Memorial Park, would it not be a cemetery? In a cemetery, people are buried in the ground. It is only the selfish Venturan dog brain that tells their selves that because there are no visible headstones, St. Mary's, Presbyterian and the Hebrew cemeteries are now a 'dog' park.
When 100 year old local pioneer graves can have their headstones stolen by the City and ok'ed by the same City Council, you have to realize that the scum in our society has risen to the top and now calls themselves the our elected leaders.
The City was charged to the upkeep of the cemetery and stopped maintenance to merit the coming mass desecration. It is against the law what the City did.
Military And Veterans Code, Sections 920-931; 940-950 and more specifically Sections 960-962.
§ 3105. Title to cemetery grounds. The title to lands used as a public cemetery or graveyard, situated in or near to any city, town, or village, and used by the inhabitants thereof continuously, without interruption, as a burial ground for five years, is vested in the inhabitants of such city, town, or village, and the lands must not be used for any other purpose than a public cemetery. [Emphasis added.]
Health and Safety Code Section 8126 (Stats. 1939)
See for more information:
http://restorestmarys.org/Sue%20Silve...
It is against Catholic Canon Law for the Archdiocese of Los Angeles to give consecrated graves to a secular body, let alone build a school house on top of consecrated graves. By their own law, they must exhume the consecrated graves, re-inter in consecrated ground and then and only then can they give a cemetery away.
The City of Ventura got so good at grave desecration, they exported their talent to the City of Whittier and their Mt. Olive and Broadway Cemeteries renamed Founder's Memorial Park with it's now 2,380 desecrated graves: http://tinyurl.com/yzp4gb7
And as soon as they could, they went down to the Calvary Cemetery at the invite of the City of San Diego and with the help of the Archdiocese of San Diego desecrated another 4,000 known graves there: http://tinyurl.com/dypxxn
If you include the 3,850 desecrated graves beneath the Holy Cross School next to the Mission on Main St.(just dumb old native American graves), the City of Ventura has their desecration fingerprints on a whooping total of 13,230 desecrated graves throughout Southern California.
These were tired and war torn Americans mostly, leaving behind the horrors of the Civil War and moving to California for a fresh start and a better life.

Little did they dream that their very graves would be hunted down by the City of Ventura and robbed of all dignity and respect.

There are 3 city governments and 2 Catholic Archdioceses that DO NOT want anyone to know what has happened the our pioneer Americans and their graves.

  • July 26, 2010
  • 11:53 p.m.
k38rescue#381307 writes:

Americans are good at opinions. But opinions are not always the best measure of truth.

This is a cemetery issue. It is not a 'dog park' issue.

As much as dog owners are being manipulated through the city to be used as a cover to make the apperance of an acceptable change, it is still a cemetery.

Dog owners are passionate folks, rightly so. Emotional connections are often easier for people to connect to a dog than to try to connect to a person for various reasons. If mankind would love our neighbors as we loved our pets, this would be a kinder world, but we do not invest in this, we avoid it selfishly more often than naught.

The City has failed, the citizens of Ventura have failed, dog owners have failed, the Catholic chuch has failed this situation and many readers as well. Repair would place back honor. Native Americans have been failed repeatedly by the new Americans, and have had many graves desecrated, they know that pain well enough. Doesn't make any of this right.

At the end of the day, the only thing that sets this right is to replace and repair damage. Opinions could dismiss all day long arguments and postures, but you still have a cemetery that has been desecrated. You still have federally violated military graves that are protected by law. I doubt anyone in the City will rectify this problem, not even with creative solutions for funding and community suport or participation, because people do not care, cities do not care and they are elected by the people, who do not care, it is a selfish model we trust, not a selfless one.

The City doesn't even enforce the 'no leash' law, and dog owners do not respect that law. I've been to the cemetery and witnessed this, and I feel a deep personal reverance for the souls buried here. I wonder if anyone else feels this is actually wrong? If my sisters grave were here I would be devastated, thankfully she is not buried here.

Thousands of graves. Like most things that are wrong, we look the other way, because we are Americans. We don't stand for anything that is good anymore, let alone respectful to others. And to our dead? Lip service until the grieving is over, then move out of the way. No respect. Apalling.